Wednesday, 16 November 2011

EGYPTIAN CANADIANS FOR DEMOCRACY PROTESTS ON NOVEMBER 19 AT DUNDAS SQUARE

Original Source Here (Mirrored with permission from Mohamed Kamal Jr. )

EGYPTIAN CANADIANS FOR DEMOCRACY PROTESTS ON NOVEMBER 19 AT DUNDAS SQUARE
A part of the growing worldwide protests against military tribunals for civilians in Egypt



Toronto ON (November 19, 2011)- The Egyptian Canadians for Democracy (ECD), an aspiring, not-for-profit organization, will be organizing a protest against Military Tribunals for Civilians in Egypt. The protest will take place this Saturday, November 19, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Dundas Square, Toronto.
The event is a part of the worldwide movement “No Military Trials”, and the protest is one of a series of worldwide protests, which have already taken place in London, Budapest, New York, Düsseldorf, Paris, Frankfurt, and Montreal.

Military tribunals for civilians are serious transgressions of human rights, and violate international law. According to the United Nations, “…article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which affirms that everyone has the right to be tried by a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal”. Military courts differ from civil courts in the sense that one is led by judges and the other is run by military personnel; civil courts allow the right to appeals, while military courts don’t. Meanwhile, if one was to appeal to the court of Cassation, another form of appeal enjoyed in civil courts, in military courts, it is made up of officers. In military courts, one does not have the right to defense, or the court itself may appoint a lawyer or an officer on one’s behalf, without one’s permission. One does not enjoy the right to demand witnesses or one’s own lawyer. Military courts may try an individual without having to refer to official medical records, in contrast with civil court, which is required by law to refer to official or professional medical records and witnesses. Meanwhile, the trials themselves, the investigations, and the prisons in which civilians serve after being tried are suspects of crimes against humanity and human rights (including torture, sexual harassment, deprivation, etc.).

Our statement:
“We are appalled by the actions of the Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) of Egypt following their acquisition of power. The Egyptian people have come out, giving up their economic stability and individual security, risking everything they had for freedom, human rights and social justice. Yet nine months later, more than 12,000 civilians are being tried in military courts, and imprisoned in military prisons for practicing their right to speak out against the system, and for criticizing the actions of a corrupt government. The SCAF had acquired their current position on the basis that they will carry the revolution, protecting it, its goals and its people. They are at this stage failing to maintain the revolution, solemnly destroying it, failing to protect the nation, and committing illegal and unjust acts of aggression against the people of Egypt.

Therefore, the Egyptian Canadians for Democracy demand the following:
1) Immediate halt of military tribunals for all civilians, including bloggers and activists and the release of over 12,000 civilian prisoners from military prisons

2) Abolition of emergency laws and granting the rights for peaceful demonstrations and general strikes

3) Independent investigation into repeated attacks on the Christian community, allegations of virginity tests carried out on female protesters, and the gruesome events of Maspero

4) Declaration of a clear road map for the transitional period, and specific dates for the transition of power to a fairly/truthfully elected president and parliament

5) Reforming the Police Forces and taking responsibility of restoring order and security in Egyptian cities and towns.

6) Refrain from media censorship or prevention of certain figures' access to media sources, and allowing freedom of speech without targeting a certain sect of the society or promoting hate speech.”
 

-ENDS-

About Egyptian Canadians for Democracy
An online political group -soon will be registered- as a Non-profit Organization, concerned with reaching out to the Egyptian community in Canada and democracy loving Canadians to form an undisputed force of change to positively influence the transition to democracy in Egypt. It is also a starting point for an active front that serves the Egyptian community in Canada and bridges the gaps between Egypt and Canada, both people and governments.

The idea of the group came as a repercussion of recent events taking place in Egypt since the January 25th revolution. It has a political dimension, as well as cultural and social. Yet for the mean time it is more focused on the political dimension and the need to bring to life the role of Egyptians living in Canada in shaping the future of the state that is being born in Egypt following the fall of Hosni Mubarak regime. The group is created by volunteers who are advocates for democracy and human rights. The group is inspired by the positive values of democracy and tolerance that are enjoyed and practiced here in Canada and aspires for all the Egyptians living in Egypt to enjoy it as well. It is meant to include the full spectra of the Egyptian community in Canada, regardless of their faith or political affiliations.
 


Release Date:

November 19, 2011

Click here to download the News Release

Contact Information:

Moe Kamal Jr.

Egyptian Canadians for Democracy
Toronto, ON

Phone: 1(647) 922 6621
ecc15jan@gmail.com 


Sunday, 13 November 2011

Egyptians Abroad Voter Registration: Figures and Commentary.

After the uphill battle to allow Egyptians abroad the right to vote, the results are disappointing.

All figures are from the official site and can be found here: http://www.elections2011.eg/index.php/2011-11-09-20-01-43/2011-11-13-20-55-34 Note: According to the website, these figures are as of 8 Pm November 13th 2011 and will be updated hourly starting on the 14th,

Summary in case you're not interested in reading:
Out of an estimated 7-10 Million Egyptians Abroad (For simplifications sake we'll Assume 7 Million) only 99,118 Have registered to vote: Meaning 1.42% of those 7 Million Egyptians abroad have registered to vote.

Of those 99,118 , Over 71% of those Registered are living in GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries. The KSA, UAE and Kuwait alone account for 70,419 of the 99,118 Registered Egyptian Voters abroad. Registered voters living in Saudi Arabia alone account for 41% of the total number of Egyptians Abroad Registered to vote.

Even if we assume that half of those 7 Million are under the age of 18 and thus cannot vote, that still means only 2.84% of Egyptians overseas have registered to vote.

According to the International Organization for Migration, Egyptians abroad contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$ 7.8 Billion in 2009)
According to the World Bank "Egypt also came in the sixth place among the top 10 remittance recipients of Middle Income Countries (MICs) in 2007"

The Exact Numbers of Registered voters per country (In no Particular Order) are as follows:

Saudi Arabia (KSA) 40729
Kuwait 16346
United Arab Emirates (UAE) 13,344
Qatar 6727
Kingdom of Oman 1919
United States of America 4658
Canada 2518
Italy 2145
France 1043
Australia 999
Germany 916
Libya 115
Chile 3
Israel 7
Yemen 43
Mexico 10
Brazil 13
Argentine 16
Costa Rica 5
New Zealand 58
Indonesia 19
Thailand 11
Russia 52
Japan 95
China 80
Cambodia 2
Malaysia 118
India 25
Afghanistan 9
Iran 4
Pakistan 27
Kazakhstan 11
Turkey 50
Norway 72
Finland 54
Sweden 195
Poland 43
Denmark 85
England (Incorrectly listed as North Ireland) 11
Ireland  (Listed as Ireland) 118
Spain 134
Portugal 20
Romania 32
Czechoslovakia 42
Croatia 5
Austria 259
Hungary 34
Greece 247
Switzerland 318
Ukraine 23
North Korea 9
South Korea 26
Sudan 103
Algeria 82
Syria 7
Cyprus 102
Jordan 283
Tunisia 39
Morocco 64
Mauritania 10
Senegal 20
Nigeria 39
Ghana 27
Niger 39
Gabon 26
Kenya 23
Uganda 18
Angola 10
Zambia 16
Tanzania 11
Kenya 23
South Africa 113
Namibia 11
Mozambique 4

If i didn't list a number for Egyptians-Abroad Voter Registration for a particular country, it means I either missed it cause of the crap website, or it has 0 voters, but you can find the countries yourself here  (And you'll understand why I'm calling it a crap site. Link is in Arabic)

Now Considering the breakdown of the Data, If the SCAF or whoever decides to screw Egyptians abroad from voting (Even after everything that's happened), The Simplest claim could be "Due to registration numbers being so low in comparison to the High Costs and Logistics, We've decided to not send voting committees overseas during this election"

The reasons the numbers of registered voters are so low may vary widely;


  • It could be because of this statement obtained via @TyAbouZeid  which claims only those ID's issued before Sept 27th 2011 can vote (Keeping in mind that the Consulates/Embassies have just recently started issuing ID's as well as the fact that the court decision to allow Egyptians Abroad to vote was obtained long after that deadline date). 
  • The numbers could be due to high costs or high inconvenience such as exemplified by @LoveThePeople "My parents want to register but said it costs $75 US (To Issue an ID) & they're on very fixed, low income. (I offered to help but won't allow me)" Or as exemplified by @AyaKhalil "Yeah. I can't really vote because I don't have a consulate near me at all. can't fly to DC #PoorGraduateStudent"
  • Hesitancy due to the warning message on the website (via @YSalah ) when you come to register that states that "Submitting this form will remove your name from the local registry inside Egypt, and you can only vote at the embassy inside the country you register in. This request cannot be cancelled. Are you sure you want to submit this request?"
  • Possibly due to registration still on going, meaning the numbers aren't final yet. 
  • Lack of  Awareness of registration (Not publicized enough)
  • Lack of Political Awareness in general.
  • Lack of Interest (In cases where those Egyptians have Zero ties to Egypt or no intentions of returning to Egypt, Which I seriously doubt are more than a couple of hundred people) 
  • Hypothetically: The numbers could simply be fake, For political purposes.
This could all be part of a Political game by the SCAF : (If we can't stop them from demanding the right to vote, we'll stop the majority from being able to vote.)



The biggest question in regards to the numbers I listed for registered Egyptian abroad voters, Other than the question of why the numbers are so low, is which side those voters lean towards. While there is no conclusive proof that those in GCC countries have Islamist or MB leanings, it is generally implied as exemplified by a brief conversation with @AhmedWagih ;
Me: " I wonder what the percentage of Egyptians abroad have MB or Islamic leanings"
@AhmedWagih : "I m a regular traveler between Cairo & Riyadh, one look at the majority of passengers will give you the answer in the largest concentration "
Me: "May you please clarify what you mean?"
@AhmedWagih : " The point is my dear that the majority of Egyptians in the Gulf will probably vote Islamists!"

But again, I have been unable to find any polls or conclusive numbers that prove that the Egyptians in the GCC countries have islamist leanings. But if they do, The results of the votes by Egyptians Abroad can be skewed by MB or Islamists in campaigns to their causes; The skew in that case could be claims that "even those abroad support Islamists", regardless of fact that numbers are unrepresentative. To the Average Egyptian, when they hear the word "Abroad" they think Europe or the west. Not GCC countries. There have been unconfirmed reports that the Muslim Brotherhood have paid the National ID issuing fees of people willing to vote for them that cannot afford the fees to issue an ID for whatever reason, as well as their own members,

I'm much more interested to know what % of those registered Egy-abroad voters are members of the Muslim Brotherhood: The Egyptian branch & otherwise.

There are no coincidences in Egypt.


Tuesday, 11 October 2011

Dear Egypt: The Cake is a lie.

With apologies to Valve and to my readers for my crappy Photoshop skills. Cake image taken from this lovely recipe.

I'll confess, I've wanted to write this post for a while, and I do admit it's LONG overdue. I did not want to write it in fear of pissing off those I love and respect, but they're free to refute what I say at any time.

After the well documented events at Maspero, I did not think I needed to write this anymore, and then I realized, it is more important now than ever to write it. No, I'm not planning on talking about Maspero. No I’m not planning on talking about the importance of Muslim-Coptic unity, or raise slogans of a cross and a crescent, nor any of those empty factors. This is not what I’m going to discuss. Others have covered the matter quite well, so please bear with me while I explain.


If we observe ourselves in retrospect, we can easily come to realize (if we were brain dead before) that the main reason of success during the 18 days (I refuse to call those 18 days the revolution. The revolution is nowhere near over), was our sense of unity.

Yes, I said unity. No, I don't mean it in a cliché manner. Again, please, bear with me.


It is not that the entirety of Egypt was united for a common goal (overthrowing Mubarak/Regime) , Evidence only shows that not only were we opposed by Mubarak's group (including the SCAF), but also by a (large) segment of the population that until this day, curses the day we ever revolted, and considers us criminals & traitors. Why they believe so is irrelevant in the context of this post, but the point is, to them, we're still bastards.

No, the unity we saw was OUR unity. Not those on twitter. But Us. A relatively small segment of the population that even if it may internally disagree on matters, still agreed on one goal: The Mubarak regime and Mubarak himself HAD to go. So strong was that unity for a common goal, that we overcame not only Mubarak, the right wingers in the west, Saudi Arabia & Mubarak's regime, but we also overcame that much larger segment of the population that still curses our names. Hell, we converted a large number of those anti-revolutionaries to our cause.

We were strong, and for now, we still are.

However, that unity, that strength is under attack, and unfortunately, the threat is more from within than from without. Do not take this the wrong way; I'm not saying that the SCAF, the NDP, and all the other Mubarakites aren't doing their utmost to divide and conquer us, but even if they're pushing for this division, it can only come to pass if we allow it to.

I understand that's a strong statement to say, but the reality is, it's true. The true enemy has always been the regime. But what needs to be clarified is that the "Regime" was not just Mubarak and his cronies; no, the regime was Mubarak. The regime is the SCAF. The regime is the NDP. The Regime is our aging "opposition" politicians and Muslim brotherhood leadership that do not know how to adapt to new circumstances. The regime is our corrupt Sheikhs and equally corrupt church leaders.

The regime is anyone that wants to maintain the old paradigms, regardless of proclaimed intent. The regime is the old guard. We are supposedly the new guard. The reason I say "Supposedly" will be made clear later.

Yet, it seems that we've prematurely assumed victory of the battle against the regime, and instead of fighting together as one against the regime, we've all eyed the "Cake" (the Cake being Egypt), and we're out to secure our own slice of the cake.

But the cake is a lie. If anything, the cake is a clump of raw dough that is nowhere near ready for everyone to claim their slice. Not only is it not ready, but the dough AND the oven (and the fire technically) are still in the hands of our true enemy; The Regime.

Sadly, instead of understanding that, we're fighting one another for an non-guaranteed potential slice of the cake.

This metaphor is not a new one. It is not my metaphor. Many have stated it before, yet few have taken heed of the warning. Take heed.

So why might our strength fail? The reasons in my humble opinion are:


1- We've (and by we, I mean those opposing the regime) are attacking one another for our differences, instead of focusing on our unity. I find it disgusting that activists, including prominent ones are attacking each other for differences of opinion & political ideology, and in turn we're alienating those that might potentially join us, by behaving in the manner. Like it or not we're leaders and we have a responsibility. Leaders are followed freely by people for their characters, even if such characters might have faults, but behaving like squabbling children is not going to garner us any support.


For example, I might not agree with Gigi Ibrahim (and indeed I rarely agree with her), but I find the constant personal attacks on her disgusting. She might be wrong quite often in my opinion, but at least she's trying.

Another example? while Mona El Tahawy might not be mother Teresa , she's still been tirelessly vocal for Egypt, Egyptians, and the revolution, and yet she's been attacked by people I respect (like 3arabwy ) and those that I don't respect, for something as simple as retweeting something I said (and still stand by). (I was attacked for it as well, but who cares?)

Another example? I love & Respect Sandmonkey to bits. I seriously do. Again, he's not the messiah reborn (even if he might sometimes act like he is), and neither is Wael Abbas (another person I respect), and to watch them take pot shots at each other, was highly saddening and depressing.

There are many other examples I'm not mentioning, don't get me started on the veiled insults, but you know the funny thing?

When Gigi Ibrahim was arrested (however briefly), a lot of those attacking her, were fearful for her safety.

If 3arabwy was to be in danger, I know Mona el Tahawy would be tireless in calls for his safety and well being (and indeed she has been before, when he was summoned by the Military for questioning), and not only that, I know if the tables were reversed, 3arabwy would do the same.

I know that if something was to happen to Wael Abbas, Sandmonkey would probably do everything he could to help him. If something was to happen to Sandmonkey, Wael would probably do everything he could to help him.

The problem is, I see this. I understand this. Those that don't know these people personally or even well do not. They only see figures they consider new leaders (and Figures in a way surpass being just Human), leaders that could define the new guard, squabbling and insulting one another, after they saw them united & strong during the 18 days.

Do we really have to wait until something happens, for us to show Egyptians and the world, that we're not just a bunch of squabblers?

2- Maintaining the old Paradigms: This is a youth led revolution, it's an absolute disgrace that in pursuit of a new Egypt, a new country, we're still allowing the decrepit derelict archaic old guard (i.e. aging opposition political leaders, Muslim brotherhood leaders, SCAF...etc.) to define our behavior and our battle, especially when they utilize fear as a major tool.

This one is so simple, it's insane, yet I’m personally guilty of falling prey to this. The old guard only knows and understands fear. They only know how to try to gain support through fear and by using fear to manipulate people. Yes, fear is not just a tool used by Mubarak and his ilk, and let me clarify how:

What does the Muslim brotherhood use to manipulate and scare people to support their cause? That Seculars hate religion, that seculars want to abolish religion, that Seculars are going to allow orgies in the streets, and public drinking and drunkards, and ban the veil, and destroy the family, France! USA! BOO! .....etc.

What do the aging opposition leaders use to manipulate and scare people to support their cause? That the Muslim Brotherhood will force everyone to wear the veil, and abolish freedoms, and censor everything, and ban art, Iran! Saudi! Boo!....etc.

You know what that reminds me of? The republicans and the Democrats in the USA. We all know how great that's worked out </sarcasm>.

Guess what? By believing that shit, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, and those on any side of the issue will fight relentlessly against the perceived threat from the other, even if in reality that threat doesn't exist and in the end only the people lose, because the threat in turn becomes real, and radical instead of rational voices will be the loudest (For Reference see how well the average American is doing these days.)

Now don't get me wrong, those fears are valid and very real... that is, if we allow the old guard to dictate our future. You may think this is me having a utopian view, but ask yourself this: when you deal with the youth on both sides that think for themselves, that don't fall prey easily to manipulations by the old guard, those that you can actually communicate with, do those fears actually still stand? If all sides see through this web of fear, and realize that it doesn't have to be the way the rancid old guard want it to be, do you think those fears will come to pass? Of course it won't.

The reality is, inside themselves, the youth on all sides do not want this to be the way things are, they want something better, but since they can't find it, they gravitate towards what seems agreeable or right to them, and once they do, that's when the web of fear snares them. Can we not break those webs? Are the republicans and democrats of the USA, or indeed any of the current politicians in the world, really an example of what we should aspire to?

You know who we should aspire to emulate? Nelson Mandela. By reassuring everyone that he wasn't going to destroy their way of life, that he wasn't going to punish them for being different, he created something new & better from the rotting carcass of the old. He did not fall prey to the old guard, to the old way of life. He saw things from the point of view of everyone, and understood the "Other" better than most people understand the "Us".

Yet instead of following in the path of visionaries and truly great people, we're following in the footsteps of idiots.


This is my plea for a wakeup call. This is my hope that even if you disagree with me, even if you think me utopian, that you understand my points.

Enough division, enough with the old Paradigms. Enough of this shit, it's done nothing but lead the world to ruin.

I can't stress this enough: This is not just a war against the Mubarakites. There is no room for Leftists vs Everyone else, or Muslim Brotherhood vs everyone else, or liberals vs everyone else. I am not saying we all have to agree. I'm saying we have to find a better more mature way to disagree than this. The reality is we NEED these differences, everyone has an essential role to play, everyone has their place, be it the leftists, the liberals, the conservatives...etc They all have their place. It's like that sheet that firemen use to catch people jumping from burning buildings: all the firemen have to pull in opposite directions, otherwise the jumper will just hit the ground. Insulting someone for not doing exactly what you're doing, or thinking exactly like you thinking, would be like advocating that only one fireman should hold the sheet: Jumper be damned.

This is a war of the New Guard Vs. The Old Guard, and if we do not understand this, we will not win, and if we do not win, soon we ourselves will be nothing but an extension of the old guard.


The Cake is a God damned lie. Until we win it back that is, and bake it like we want it : Sweet, healthy, and regime free.




Saturday, 23 July 2011

Egypt: El Kora Feen? (Where's the Ball?)

"Abassyia Today, In front of the Ministry of Defense"

"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat." ~ Unknown Source

"It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle." ~ Sun Tzu's the Art of War

"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill." ~ Sun Tzu's the Art of War


On reflection on the events of July 23rd I must state pointlessly, Business as usual in Egypt (i.e. Chaos).

I know I might be hated for this post, But I would rather state my thoughts. I'm not going to list the events of today that are Better chronicled elsewhere. I would just like everyone reading to step away for a moment from their passions, their anger, and think about what I'm saying rationally.

A question I found interesting posed by someone: “July 23rd, Jan 25, is the goal to wipe out Egyptian history?". We all know how much we value our history.

Concerning events like today, I believe activists that didn't believe in today were faced with a dilemma: Join or support a march they don't believe in, Or refrain from doing so and be considered soft on the SCAF.

There are a few things I find that we, the liberal secular activists must face head on: Harsh truths we've yet to deal with, that will come back to bite us in the ass if we don't deal with them like we should. The worst of these truths? We're not popular among the general population, The SCAF is. We're not the majority. But we are a strong force, we're not wrong, and we CAN win over the masses, but we just need to change our attitudes; we are too reactive.

No matter what happens, we're branded as traitors seemingly by the vast majority of the population, in a wide myriad of different ways; On Jan 25 we were foreign agents of Iran/Israel/Qatar/USA/Disney Land/Hogwarts/Mama Samia out to destroy Egypt. Later on when the Army violently allowed (and assisted) the removal of the tents in Tahrir and cleared the square, we were "Thugs, and not the Jan 25 people”, Every time since, we've been called "Thugs that aren't the JAN 25 People”. Notice a trend? Notice something we ourselves do?

The Art of War by Sun Tzu states in summary that "Defining the battlefield wins you the war, even if you lose battles" and we've yet to define the battlefield. Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating a war in the conventional sense, but this is a struggle, a fight, a war.

My point is, we're letting the SCAF define our battles, and as such we're always at a disadvantage; The SCAF does something we dislike, we respond by protesting. They do something worse, we start marching. And the entire time, we end up losing the war bit by bit.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the protests in general, I'm not against the marches in general, but I am against them when they're a bad tactical move; in a game of chess, you don't expose the king to save a pawn, at least not unless it's part of a smart & detailed strategy that you're 100% sure will win you the game.

We must define the battles in order to win the war; the way to win this war is to win hearts & minds, not "battles" that we lose by default.

The harsh truth we have to face is that it's extremely likely that the majority of the attackers aren't "thugs"; rather they're a part of the (possibly growing?) Misguided segment of the population that is convinced we're out to destroy the country.  Why do they believe that? Propaganda is a very powerful tool. I'm sure I'm not the only one that felt that the last speech by the SCAF Spokesman (Also known as "That finger guy". I think the pointer finger usage is an army thing), or their last two "Statements" Statement 69 and Statement 70, were nothing more than a thinly veiled call for an attack on the protestors, or possibly a call for a civil war. We are not reaching them the way the corrupt state media is, that is if we're even reaching them at all.  Hence we are not winning hearts & minds like the SCAF is. Tell me this: since when can a thug enter Abassyia & not be beaten by its residents? Have you considered this possibility? How many people reading this have actually been in Abassyia before? Did we forget that a lot of people that took part in the violent clearing of Tahrir before were residents of Tahrir? Did we forget that a lot of the residents of the Tahrir area, curse the protestors day and night?

If we want to win this, we need to think. I'm not saying there are no hired thugs, but we need to stop being disrespectful of those that disagree with us even if they do so violently (by calling them thugs),  Yes, I realize that sounds insane, but it's not, violence has been ingrained in our society for decades, people will defend themselves from perceived threats, even with violence. When was the last time you saw people resort to the law to settle their differences, rather than fight it out? I can't blame them, our legal system was and still is utterly useless. We do not want a civil war and without winning hearts and minds, that's what we'll eventually get.

We need to have a strong detailed concrete plan, a plan that includes all elements; Social, Political, Economical, basically everything, that can be presented to the people as an alternative to the plan presented by the SCAF, At least then, the general population will no longer regard us as a bunch of destructive agents, or at best just a bunch of whiny little cry babies, shouting at every slight, with no plan to back up their slogans. Then and only then, will we be considered by the general population as a well organized, prepared group, that is looking out for the benefit of the country, not its destruction. 



Sunday, 12 June 2011

Egypt: Let them eat Basbousa

I.E "It's the economy stupid"

Basbousa. Yum.

The well known story attributed to Marie-Antoinette (although there's no record of it actually being her), Says that when a princess was told that the people are starving because they can't find bread, she responded with "Let them eat cake", which was proof that she neither understood, nor cared about the plight of the poor.

Now when it comes to Egypt, it seems the ruling government in response to the plight of the average citizen, is saying "Let them eat Basbousa

Now the reason I say this is simple, With so many people living under the poverty line, high unemployment and so many people literally starving in Egypt, It's no wonder people revolted. Hell, it's no surprise that some people revolted specifically for economical reasons.

In post-18-days Egypt (I refuse to say post-revolution, because the revolution isn't over, regardless of what anyone thinks) there have been (overblown & sensationalized ) concerns over the state of the Egyptian economy, as well as the belief that Egypt will be facing bankruptcy , To the extent that the Government has pursued loans of 3 billion $ from the highly unpopular IMF (If you need to know why they're unpopular, This article is a pretty decent start) Even though the general consensus is that no one in Egypt wants help from the IMF because of their country destroying policies, that they've already tried to impose on Egypt. Not to mention the possibility of accepting Aid from Saudi Arabia with no mention of what the terms and conditions attached to the money are (Saudi Arabia is extremely Anti-Revolution, Which is like accepting food from someone that wants to poison you.) In short, I find some of the actions of the ruling government to be quite... well odd.

I'm not going to discuss the clearly intentional diesel shortage in Egypt, I'm not going to mention that the Stock market everyone was freaking out about, ended 3 weeks of trading at a profit of 5 billion Egyptian Pounds (Around 840 million dollars), or even that some of the most notorious corporations are mainly the ones interested in investing in Egypt , those are just a few examples among others that I don't really need to discuss, But I'm going to wonder about this: How does it make sense for a country facing "Economic issues" to condone frivolous spending?

As far as I've been able to tell, most "Modern" governments don't allow frivolous spending. There's ONE White house in the USA. But In Egypt, with all the panic about the Economy, we're still paying for the upkeep of over Eight different (Known) presidential palaces (How many are secret? No clue.) , Isn't Mubarak Gone?! We can assume that the average upkeep of one presidential palace is at least around 10,000 to 30,000 L.E a month. Not to mention that just one of those palaces (The Sharm Palace that Mubarak currently resides in) is valued at 36 million Egyptian pounds (Although originally bought for 500 thousand only).  Shouldn't the people benefit more from these places? If not sold, Can they not be used as touristic attractions? I doubt they can anymore, considered apparently they've been looted of everything of value "Baghdad" style. Then Again, the Military seems to have made "good" use of one presidential Palace (Date and time of the article suggests that Yes, The SCAF were planning to be the "Presidents" of Egypt for a while)

At the same time, No one seems to give a damn that Samir Radwan (who has links to the IMF) the current Finance Minister (who was originally assigned to his post by Mubarak) gave Government newspapers (their Sales were not effected by revolution in the slightest) 42 million Egyptian pounds during the revolution, and yet no one questioned him on that.

Not to mention that the "police" still got their salaries throughout the months they didn't work in (Estimated at around 6 billion Egyptian pounds), Only to go back to the same mentality of superioritybrutality and lack of basic respect for fellow humans, with no real attempt at restructuring or rehabilitation, while so far only one cop (In absentia ) has been convicted for the murder of over 800 protesters, they only just got a minor face lift, and yet they have been rewarded with new gas guzzling 4x4 cars (I guess they need better cars for when the officers cruise the streets looking for women to Harass, and don't tell me it's to restore the cars destroyed in the revolution) , not to mention the fact that The police, Army and other government services have sports teams, that WE pay for while they keep the profits. Or that we're the ones paying for the MOI 'reconciliation' campaign.You know, for cops that don't do anything useful? So they torture & kill us, are corrupt, want to start a new page without accountability AND we're paying to improve their image? Since there's fear for Egypt money wise, then instead of us paying for a pricey campaign to improve police image, shouldn't they you know, do their jobs instead? I can't be the only person that realizes how utterly insane this is. Then again, It comes as no surprise since the "Police coalition" has disbanded after obtaining their demands (Even though the rest of the country has yet to get their demands even acknowledged sometimes)

Or on another note, that State owned and funded media, has a 12 billion Egyptian pound debt while turning out profits. Not to mention that paid manpower is being wasted on the drafting of laws none of us want or even asked for (Like the Anti-Protest law, or the Internet Censorship law) , nor are some of them even critical.

Apparently we're going to have an "Internet Filter" in Egypt, with the usual excuses "Fighting child pornography & terrorism" , But the worrisome part is that they want to ban "Pornographic" websites as well. Yeah, because I totally trust the authorities not to block "Undesirable" websites as well on whim (Like every other Arab country with a similar law have done already), Considering Youtube, Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, Blogs....etc technically can and do contain pornography, they'll be able to legally block them. They claim they're never going to cut off the Internet like Mubarak did, but with a grand firewall, they won't need to. Twitter or Facebook giving the Egyptian Government a hard time? They won't need to cut off your Internet, they'll just "filter" it using their great firewall (you know, like China or Saudi Arabia). Think I'm over blowing it? The same government that said that if they don't fulfill our demands, Not only can we protest all we want, but that they'd join us in the protests, are the same ones that passed the law criminalizing protests. (To quote the current prime minister Essam Sharaf on his day of inauguration : "I will try with all of my heart to meet your demands. And on the day that I will not be able to fulfill your demands, I will be out there with you and not up here." ). Do you honestly think what I'm saying is irrational?

So we revolt, they continue brutal aggression, they lie to us and bamboozle us, they censor the media (to the extent that In our now "Free" media, the term "Ousted president" has been banned, and you can only say "Former president" about Mubarak), They want to censor the Internet and they blame us for screwing up the economy (which the main reason it's suffering? LACK OF SECURITY! Entire TRUCKS carrying products or merchandise from factories or elsewhere are getting hijacked on the highways that the Ministry Of Interior Mansour Essawy claimed they're securing) , while they're still sinking money into bullshit Mubarakesque expenses.

And does anyone care or notice? Nope, because they've done an excellent job of distracting the masses.

Seriously the amount of wasteful bullshit that is being paid for by Egyptian public funds is staggering. Yes I know the numbers might not be "THAT" Big, but they add up, and these are only the numbers that I'm aware of.... what about the rest?

Can this money being spent frivolously be used to either help the people starving, or at the very least decrease our debts?


So ask yourself this, what other bullshit expenses are we Egyptians still paying for?!

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

New Islamic Directions: The Ethics of Chivalry Between Genders

I rarely if ever, will only just post a direct link to an article, but this is such a good read, and so relevant to my previous post, that it should be read: Middle eastern Muslim or generally a Muslim, or otherwise.


Read it NOW

Link one

Link two


Monday, 30 May 2011

Insane Marriage Rites: A Case of The Need for a Cultural Revolution

Note: I originally wrote and posted this on facebook on Saturday, June 19, 2010 at 3:20am

I have modified and added a few parts to it. But it serves as an example of why we not only need a political and economical revolution, but a cultural one as well. I'm sure I'll eventually post more examples.
-------------------



I honestly believe the above image had a role in leading to the January 25th 2011 revolution. With people realizing this is what they might end up doing, They can do some crazy things. Further proven by people celebrating after Mubarak stepped down saying "Hanetgawez Hanetgawez" (We will marry, we will marry) , or a guy innocently asking his father "Does this mean I can finally get married?" as quoted by this article : "Amidst the shouts of youth claiming a new hope for a family life that has been otherwise economically impossible for them in the dire conditions of Mubarak’s regime, protesters in the streets joyfully exclaimed after he stepped down, “We will marry, we will have children!”

Remember, most of the world doesn't require these rites, and they function just fine.


So I'm going to say it.
All of what I’m going to say next is on most if not all of your minds (If you're an Egyptian), you think it, and you believe it.
But very few of you are willing to say it for whatever reason. So I’ll just say it.

I find the entire concept of marriage rites here in Egypt frankly retarded. And I don't mean the silly weddings, the retarded cake feeding, and all that silly stuff. I mean the rites leading up to that point.

The major point? Money. Lots and lots of money. As a male of my social standing wanting to get married in Egypt (To an Egyptian),you're looking at needing a bare minimum of 580k Egyptian pounds (around 100k$) just to get married. No one and I mean NO one can afford that on their starting salary unless their parents hook them up, they win the lottery, or they create something so amazing, or they land an acting job or something in a major movie.

Now let me put it this way, for someone of my education (college graduate from a "prestigious" university, fluent in two languages perfectly...etc), 3000 L.E (Egyptian Pounds) a month (around 500$) is considered a good/great starting salary. That means I would require roughly 194 times my starting salary just to get married. That's assuming I have no expenses, pay no taxes, and save every last piaster (Egyptian version of a cent) made. 

Keep in mind that ratio is roughly more or less the same even if the numbers differ, when you go up or down the social/economical scale. Roughly 194 times your starting salary. Raises when available are around 10% a year. Promotions are not frequent enough. Does that sound reasonable to you?

So tell me, what's the point of these insane financial requirements asked of the males? Is it to prove that the man is worthy of your daughter's hand? Are you selling your daughter? Is your daughter worth 580k+ to you? Besides, how is getting that sum proof that the male is worthy of your daughter, when it's not even his hard earned money. What is the point of these crippling requirements? To assure your daughter has a good life? What if this rich fellow is a spoiled angry wife beater, cheater, alcoholic, drug addict...etc that knew how to hide all that until after marriage? Is that really better for your daughter than the guy of modest means that would've taken extremely good care of her and loved her more than anything? Sure they would struggle a bit, but in the long run it would've been better.

And even if it WAS his hard earned money (probably at age forty something at that rate) would it not be more beneficial for the couple to use that money in other forms? Besides, could not the rich man in a day lose all his money? Then what happens to your daughter then? How then have you secured her future?

Besides, why is marrying your daughter worth that much anyway? What makes her worth more than the man? We're in the age of equality, why don't I see females paying 580k+ to marry a guy without being stigmatized (although personally I’d feel emasculated if I were that guy I guess). I don't condone this, but is marriage not a union, a team, a couple, a partnership?

Is the mentality behind this mindset largely due to the patriarchal mentality of women being helpless?

Not that I don't understand the mentality behind this line of reasoning from parents in Egypt (And marrying without parental acceptance in Egypt? Yeah, Good luck on that, it rarely, if ever happens) , with high real estate costs, high rent, rising prices, high turnover...etc it's no wonder that these parents want to make sure their daughter is "Safe", But that's all it is, There's nothing in religion (Be it Islam or Coptic Christianity) to encourage this type of behavior, or even support it, and in fact, these requirements don't really lead to any real "safety" for their daughter.

You know what these requirements lead to (if the man is the one that earned the money)? Bitter men with a sense of entitlement. Very Bitter. They feel they're the ones that did everything and the females got everything without effort or working for it. Which Leads to a mentality of "I'm the one doing everything, you've done nothing. What are you complaining about" when facing spousal disagreements or all out fights. And while I personally would not feel that way, I’m sorry to say, they’re not entirely to blame for feeling that way. Would you honestly not feel the same? If you answered “No” you’re either lying, or a rare person, welcome to either club.

But tell me, could a male feel superior to the female if they reached whatever point they reached, side by side, suffering and working together towards their goals? He could, but it would be because of his own internal issues, not because the circumstances forced upon him which led him to feel this way.
Partners, Sports teams and teams in general build a bond of "we did this together"; going through hardships together creates a very strong bond. So why would you not want the same concept applied to the marriage of your daughter?

Of course there are exceptions to the rule, parents that give their daughter to the one that loves and cares for her, no matter what his own means, instead of giving her to the rich guy. Or men from modest means, that appear to love your daughter but are mainly assholes, or men from rich families that are really good decent guys that understand the value of your daughter.

But at the end the point is, why not use your brain instead of your calculator?

And not that marriage or even love is all about sex, and in absolutely no way am I excusing sexual harassment, but in a society with dismal sexual education, a society that considers sex outside of wedlock to be one of the, if not the most horrible of sins, as a public opinion case shows, to the point of subjecting young girls to FGM (Female Genital mutilation) even though it's outlawed  even though there have been public awareness campaigns to ban it, as well as it being incorrect religiously, is it any wonder that we have such a large sexual harassment epidemic, or that large numbers of youth resort to "illegal" "Urfi" marriages?
  
I mean after all, is it not a basic need to be able to love, marry and fornicate?